Reviewer analytics
Throughput only. There is no composite reviewer score anywhere in this portal and there never will be.
Analytics measure throughput, not judgement quality. A reviewer with slower average time-in-stage but higher tier-2 catch rate is doing the harder work, not the worse work.
Stage 4 . Named authentication
5 campaigns waiting
2
Rebalance before adding new clones
34%
Reviewers above the median are doing the harder work
| Reviewer | Role | Stages | Queue depth | Median time in stage | Completion rate | Tier-2 catch rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Coleman | BD Director | 2, 4 | 11 | 26 hours | 92% | 34% |
| T. Willis | Governance | 3 | 9 | 52 hours | 90% | 68%Above median |
| S. Ahmed | Marketing lead | 3 | 6 | 41 hours | 87% | 61%Above median |
| J. Rossi | Account-owner | 4 | 4 | 18 hours | 95% | 22% |
| A. Nwosu | BD Director | 2 | 3 | 22 hours | 83% | 29% |
Use these numbers to rebalance queues, not to rank people. Auto-suggest in the builder orders reviewers by queue depth, then completion rate, then domain relevance.